And once again, I guess this is a cynical post. Been just going through the evening, seeing people complain about the prop 8 stuff that went on earlier today. Now, I'm starting to see people discuss faith, discussing what "Jesus really said" or whatever. And I guess it's all nice. To assure yourself that it's not the Savior himself attacking homosexuality, but it's Paul. Or Moses. and all of the fundamentalist movement.
And yes, I guess it's an idea. Maybe if you undermine a religion's foundation on what Jesus really said, you may be able to get all of the followers to see the light.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
People (in general, you know it doesn't apply to everyone) are typically stubborn when it comes to religion. And I'm not just talking about "religious people," I mean even people who claim to be athiests. Other people who try to deliberately undermine your beliefs don't end up changing minds, they end up building a lovely little barrier between people. Religion itself has a tendency to unite people. Spirituality is stronger than some may think. When someone tries to tell you your religion is wrong, you don't go to athiests, you go to religious leaders.
In a bit of a more concrete level, telling Christians that Paul is wrong is like telling Jews that Moses is wrong as well. Let's be honest. Both denounce male/male sex and claim it dirty, unclean, vulgar. Moses is writer, recorder of the law. Paul? what was he? He wrote 13 books/letters in the New Testament and helped Christianity gain hold in lands far away from Jerusalem. Realistically, it is almost impossible to get a majority of Christian demoninations to denounce Paul's letters.
So, different strategy? Attacking religion itself is pointless to further any overthrow of prop8. It wasn't religion that made it pass. It was fear. People are predictable because they will never support that which they fear. And when ad campaigns focus on that fear, then people will act on it. It's not a question of belief. It's a question of what's different. If you can persuade people that a person is different, it then makes them inhuman. Would you vote for someone's rights when they're inhuman? no. For this kind of stuff to pass in the future, religious efforts aren't going to cut it. They'll only vote for people who are "normal people." Sad, but true. the only way for things to go the right way is for the public to feel like we're all human.
And yes, I guess it's an idea. Maybe if you undermine a religion's foundation on what Jesus really said, you may be able to get all of the followers to see the light.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
People (in general, you know it doesn't apply to everyone) are typically stubborn when it comes to religion. And I'm not just talking about "religious people," I mean even people who claim to be athiests. Other people who try to deliberately undermine your beliefs don't end up changing minds, they end up building a lovely little barrier between people. Religion itself has a tendency to unite people. Spirituality is stronger than some may think. When someone tries to tell you your religion is wrong, you don't go to athiests, you go to religious leaders.
In a bit of a more concrete level, telling Christians that Paul is wrong is like telling Jews that Moses is wrong as well. Let's be honest. Both denounce male/male sex and claim it dirty, unclean, vulgar. Moses is writer, recorder of the law. Paul? what was he? He wrote 13 books/letters in the New Testament and helped Christianity gain hold in lands far away from Jerusalem. Realistically, it is almost impossible to get a majority of Christian demoninations to denounce Paul's letters.
So, different strategy? Attacking religion itself is pointless to further any overthrow of prop8. It wasn't religion that made it pass. It was fear. People are predictable because they will never support that which they fear. And when ad campaigns focus on that fear, then people will act on it. It's not a question of belief. It's a question of what's different. If you can persuade people that a person is different, it then makes them inhuman. Would you vote for someone's rights when they're inhuman? no. For this kind of stuff to pass in the future, religious efforts aren't going to cut it. They'll only vote for people who are "normal people." Sad, but true. the only way for things to go the right way is for the public to feel like we're all human.
Leave a comment

